ZAPPGovernance

ZAPP Code of Conduct

Last update: March 2026

This is part of the ZAPP Governance Documents.

Purpose

This code of conduct outlines our expectations for the Zebrafish Toxicology Phenotype Atlas (ZAPP) community, which includes faculty, staff, users, data providers, students, workshop participants, and all other contributors and members. It describes how to report unacceptable behavior. We are committed to providing a welcoming and inspiring environment for all and expect this code of conduct to be honored. All members of the ZAPP community are expected to abide by this code of conduct in agreement with the standards for professional behavior outlined and enforced by the NIH Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion, at https://www.edi.nih.gov/.

Our Standards

Our ZAPP community strives to:

Ethical Standards

All members of the ZAPP community will be expected to abide by the highest research ethical standards in accordance with the Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science, Moore (2011), and the AI code of ethics (https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/). Plagiarism and data fabrication will not be allowed. These and other ethics violations will be reported.

Copying and/or sharing unpublished data (such as images) or protocols presented during workshops or shared within the project is strictly prohibited without prior authorization from the authors of the data or protocols.

Conflict Resolution

The organizers have an established track record of successful collaboration, and expect to reach common agreement on management issues by thoroughly discussing and carefully considering the pros and cons of specific actions. They do not foresee any disagreements that would negatively affect the proposed research. It is thus expected that any scientific challenges or differences of opinion will be resolved through constructive discussion among all involved individuals. If they fail to resolve the dispute within 7 days, the conflict shall be referred to an arbitration committee consisting of one impartial senior executive from each organizer’s institution and a fifth impartial senior executive mutually agreed upon by the organizers. No members of the arbitration committee will be directly involved in the research grant or disagreement. Input will be sought from the NIH Program Officer in resolving the conflict.

Reporting Issues

If you experience or witness unacceptable behavior, or have any other concerns, please report it by contacting Drs. Sabrina Toro (sabrina@tislab.org) and Alexa Burger (ALEXA.BURGER@cuanschutz.edu). All reports will be handled with discretion. In your report please include:

If you file a report, Dr. Toro and Dr. Burger will contact you personally, review the incident, follow up with any additional questions, and make a decision as to how to respond. If the person who is harassing you is one of the persons designated to receive these reports, please contact the Co-PIs, Melissa Heandel (melissa@tislab.org) or Anne Thessen (annethessen@gmail.com), instead. We will respect confidentiality requests for the purpose of protecting victims of abuse.

Attribution

This code of conduct is based on the Open Code of Conduct from the TODO Group, Code of Conduct from the Galaxy Community Conference 2019, and Code of Conduct from GenoPhenoEnvo Governance and Operations Manual.